Hixon Falls (Five)
I took a few rolls that day but the images from this roll are my favourite. They have an eerie quality to them that I really like. I’ll be honest though, they’re the result of me screwing up.
I didn’t properly account for reciprocity with this film, so technically, this photo is severely underexposed. I exposed for sixty seconds but I should have exposed for twice that. Normally that sort of thing would drive me nuts, but in this case I’m very happy I wasn’t thinking. Earlier in the day I went into the river up to my chest, so I was a little damp.
§
Next photo: Pleasant Bay September 2007 Five
Previous photo: Pleasant Bay September 2007 Three
Random photo: Gulls Over Whitby Harbour
Similar: Hixon Falls (Six), Hixon Falls (Ten), Economy Falls, September 2010 (One), Economy Falls, September 2010 (Two)
Respond on twitter
Permanent link: http://betterleftunsaid.ca/hixon-falls-five/
Short link: http://llvn.ca/2o
- Camera
- Zero Image 2000 Pinhole
- Lens
- none
- Filter
- none
- Film
- Ilford PanF+ 50
- Developer
- Kodak XTOL 1+3
- Development
- Small tank for 12 minutes at 20 degrees Celsius. Agitation was for four seconds at the start, then four inversions per minute.
- Date
- March, 2010
- Location
- 53.44886,-122.55699
- Copyright
- 2010 Chris Jones. All rights reserved.
- Note
- Pinhole aperture is f138, exposure was for 60 seconds